Quote from: Magic8Ball on June 22, 2014, 12:03:58 AM

Quote from: ChuckOne on June 20, 2014, 04:06:20 PM

Quote from: Come-from-Above on June 18, 2014, 08:19:41 PM

u r kidding right? ur leader states it from his own mouth:

Quote from: utopianfuture https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.msg7279112#msg7279112

I had a few sockpuppet accounts

U post the proof its not the case dude, u need to defend this guy not me.

~CfA~

Just like that. Scam at its finest. Sorry for you, but this will stick to people's mind no matter what.

It is the same as the distribution of Nxt. It sticks.

Thats what you would like to believe. Less than 70 vs at least a 1000. It is a huge difference.

yea ... it is strange that the magnitudes' difference is ignored, tho the people here are really trusting the math

Copy+paste again :
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ofc a good distribution can be determined. There is a method, but we do not know it. So, even you can't say "it isn't well distributed".
If only one owns all the coins, it is some kind of distribution.
After some time has passed, there will be X owners.

Maybe a good distribution is such that the number of coin owners X increases with a certain speed S (delta(X)/time). X and S need to be such that the coin "lives" = people are interested in it + it has quite stabile value (or at least not -10% in every week) + ...

...

if S_NXT could be calculated eg. for every week, and the most of the NXT owners are satisfied with the distribution, then we can determine a 'good distribution', and that can be an example to all the coins

"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The same issues have to be written again and again, month after month - thanks this decentralization Wink

Not meaning just NXT forums but others, too.