Quote from: HoodRich on June 22, 2014, 10:56:37 AM

Quote from: coincrow on June 22, 2014, 08:29:33 AM

Quote from: Minerals on June 21, 2014, 10:03:23 PM

I want to know what you guys think of the top priority that I should now choose for the Minerals development so I've updated voting for this thread.

If I missed something just let me know, I'll add more options to voting

I would suggest you recognize the current trend "ANON". Once we add anon, other features easily follow due to market value & confidence. I'm surprised to see lot of people voted for betting feature. Only ANON can bring rapid value to MIN. Whales are watching and they love ANON Wink

If you are going to implement any other feature than ANON then you will turn this coin into Silk Coin #2 (with so many features, but no market)

ANON is a passing fad... Look at CLOAK and SUPERCOIN... They have working ANON, yet they are not going anywhere. In other words, there is no "DRK" moment going on... Why? Because the world is moving on to the next big thing... ANON will not bring value long term. The betting system could make this coin bigger than LTC. Gaming is a multi-billion dollar business (Billion with a "B"). And, this will be a big introduction for the youth to the "use" of crypto currency (actual use not a pump and dump trading coin like all others right now accept BTC). It is kinda like McDonald's and their Happy Meals and Playground. Simply, McDonald's is breeding new life long customers everyday...

The ANON is only the sizzle. It should be added, but AFTER the ecosystem is in place. The E-game betting is the steak and will place this coin in the $100 million range. Anyone can copy an ANON (See RZR)... But how many can recreate the ecosystem that the Dev is creating?

Sit back and relax... I have a feeling that this is going to be bigger than "Doge" "DRK" and "BC" combined... soon

This idea is so unique that I expect to see 1000 BTC a day trading on C-Cex soon... just because of it. MP and Polo will add after that.

anon is not a passing fad. it is important to have anonimity technology in the cryptobusiness as privacy is aimed to be protected through these channels. if your dev isnt around, community is bogus and unfriendly, lack any marketing initiative, and most of all.. DID NOT HAVE A FAIR DISTRIBUTION PROCESS... your coin is going to suffer for a long time because someone has super large chunk of the pie.

minerals dev is here and honest
minerals community is friendly and helpful and very active
minerals had the most fair distribution in crypto for a long time
minerals is actively being developed and new features to be added later on
minerals has a name that can actually be used in commerce.

i dont understand why someone would say "dont put anon features". it's like saying "this coin needs no privacy technology for big investors to protect their identity". because then why use crypto? just use fiat and publish ur idcard/driver's license every time you buy. crypto is a different beast and it is not non-challant about privacy.

at the end of the day.. compare the price of min and the price of the coins with anon features vs their supply of coins. generally theyre all valued at significantly more than min.

just an announcement and consideration of anon integration is enough to see some waves in the price from speculators.