Quote from: urwhatuknow on June 22, 2014, 01:33:05 PM

Quote from: Torque on June 22, 2014, 01:16:47 PM

Quote from: urwhatuknow on June 22, 2014, 12:46:49 PM

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 22, 2014, 12:32:29 PM

Quote from: urwhatuknow on June 22, 2014, 12:27:18 PM

Giancarlo
Bitfinex Team

So essentially all you are saying is: Hurr, durr you can't prove it.

Sure that makes it ok, right?

What I'm just saying is that I'll be glad to prove him wrong, but I want him to pay for his completely idiotic allegations.
What you are doing here is confusing absence of evidence with evidence of absence.
I can prove the fairness of every single transaction on Bitfinex, but I just need to reward the 2 parties that will then come and witness the fact that the trade wasn't a fake trade.
Nobody does anything for nothing and MatTheTwat has to learn his lesson.
He has a concrete chance of making 100 BTC.
If he's right ( and he's not).

Spitting hot air out of your mouth is easy, a little bit more difficult is to place your bet and lose your coins in case you are proven wrong.

Don't you agree with me?

Giancarlo

Actually, I respectfully disagree. Unfortunately in the current state of the Bitcoin world, and in light of the Mt. Gox implosion and other numerous incidents where exchanges either went under due to incompetence or their operators closed up and ran off with the coins, the onus of responsibility of proving an exchange "being on the level" resides with the exchange operators. It's called transparency, and it is required to earn the public's trust.

You guys had no problem with having an independent audit done back in April to prove your solvency. You didn't first demand a bet to be made with someone before proving it. I don't see how this situation is any different. And why do you "need to reward the 2 parties that will then come and witness the fact that the trade wasn't a fake trade"?

Transparency doesn't mean to spend time in justifying ourselves against allegations that don't make sense.
MatTheTwat is blaming Bitfinex because his stop order wasn't executed at the price he selected.
Now even a 5 years old retard knows that a stop loss order is executed at the best price available in that given time.
It is not our fault if other ask orders were pulled when the price started to go up.
This is normal as several bots are programmed in such a way, i.e. withdraw orders when the price spikes up.
To blame this on the platform, accusing people to deliberately steal 30 usd is not only a symptom of douchebagness, but also of the fact that his IQ is smaller than his shoe size.
I can trace the guys that had the ask orders placed and pulled them off when the price started to raise.
They can come on this thread and witness that nothing is wrong with this particular case.
But as I said nobody does nothing for free and I want the Twat to be exposed to his own stupidity.
He has a good opportunity to make a lot of coins if he's right ( he's not).
But kids like him never make facts follow their words, they are just a whisper in the wind.

Have a good day everybody, I'm off for a run

Giancarlo
Bitfinex Team

_______________________________________________________________________________ __________________

Quote

Now even a 5 years old retard...............symptom of douchebagness, but also of the fact that his IQ is smaller than his shoe size.

What kind of professional, serious business talks to its customers in this manner and revels account balances?
They are well known for participating in bump and dumps and have fake volume.
If you have dealings with this retards you deserve to get goxxed.
Having lost a total of 112 btc on two exchanges (not gox) i certainly would not touch Bitfinix with a ten foot pole.