Quote from: btell on June 22, 2014, 06:46:11 PM

Quote

Source or GTFO. I think Evan would write better than that.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=641178.msg7167727#msg7167727

And where does it write that Darkcoin is a fun project like DOGE? Nowhere. You misrepresent quotes.

Let me enlighten you about something.

This is a Quantum Reality, meaning thoughts interact with this world. But more importantly, visions interact with this world in a more potent way. A man with a vision can move mountains. But it's all related to the basic intent of the vision. Nothing happens here by accident, no matter what Evan has said - because even his quotes are contradictory on occasion, so you'll either go with one or the other.

Evan's vision, stated since the start, was to make a top altcoin that could even give Bitcoin a run for its money.

Quote from: eduffield on January 22, 2014, 12:35:18 AM

We're building XCoin into a moderately-anonymous network, where the transactions are sent encrypted and only able to be read the party who is receiving the funds. Blocks will be published via CoinJoin as to ensure some amount of anonymity. This is being built in such a way to compete with the other top alt-coins and maybe even Bitcoin.

Quote from: eduffield on May 28, 2014, 01:11:37 AM

My goal with Darkcoin has always been to take the #2 spot from Litecoin.

...and this vision is gradually being build up four-five months along the way. The whole chain of top altcoins is being catalyzed by DRK's ascent and Litecoin has lost half its value and gaining downward momentum as even the multi-thousand BTC walls were unable to preserve its price >0.017. The battle of Dark vs Lite is on. At the same time, ripples have been made in the altcoin world due to DRK and the pursuit of anonymity.

The main "vision" and intent of coins that are trying to cash-in in the wake of Dark, is like this: "We can also make an anonymous coin / or promised anon coin and get some share of the pie / get some cash". Some by offering something, some by going the scam way in which the dev runs with the money straight away. But these coins will always be limited by the vision of their creator which was to be small-time players that are just going to take some part of the slice. Nobody has a larger vision and this lack of vision is what will forever hinder their project in ways that they cannot fathom or calculate. I could analyze that one further on how the lack of vision has affected other anon cryptocurrencies in their deficiencies but it would be perceived as an attack to them, so I won't.