Quote from: Biffa on June 23, 2014, 08:46:48 AM

Quote from: RoadStress on June 23, 2014, 08:27:29 AM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on June 23, 2014, 08:21:11 AM

So you're not interested in the facts, just trolling.
Thanks for clarifying that; I'll stop wasting my time answering you.

I am interested in facts. Facts which you are evading to tell and you put me to search for them. If you say that the bet should have been a Win for BFL then you must know the terms for the bet. Putting me to search for them is a waste of time. If you don't know the terms for the bet then you just talked without nothing to back it up, but I am sure it's not your case.

Please tell us why should the bet be a Win for BFL! Only because there was a shipping label which was never actually used for a long period of time?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=165500.0

Problem was the title of the bet was at odds with the description of the bet which is why it was classed as a draw (rightly or wrongly, I wasn't involved so am not interested)

Thank you. As I said the bet was made by a rushed person, not by lawyers. I am sure that he wasn't even aware that the title is part of the agreement. What matters is that the scope of the bet was is BFL will ship units before 1st April. They clearly haven't shipped anything before or on 1st April. They didn't ship anything the whole April and May month. That's what matters. Luke-Jr says that the bet should be a Win for BFL because they clearly shipped so many units before 1st April.

Edit: Unfortunately the bet was made so horribly wrong because it only asks for a hashing proof. Not having the unit in hand. Worst bet ever! But thank you Luke-Jr for helping scammers from BFL to get a draw on that bet by posting the required pictures 30 minutes before the deadline. We really need more people like you!