Quote from: flower1024 on June 23, 2014, 01:38:27 PM

Quote from: Denni on June 23, 2014, 01:27:51 PM

Quote from: darkota on June 23, 2014, 01:20:07 PM

Quote from: Hexah on June 23, 2014, 01:17:24 PM

Quote from: flower1024 on June 23, 2014, 01:04:27 PM

Quote from: Lamalicious on June 23, 2014, 12:52:21 PM

Wow! Didnt pay much attention to the forum lately, as it turns out - I should have. Nice research. Going to look into it.

Thanks. I was really passionate about it. I wanted to check if BCN blockchain was formed as a result of people's interaction or just machinery falsification. Now I'm sure it was made by humans.

I wonder why people preferred simply dumping the coins as opposed to holding on to them. Were these services or goods really that tempting to spend BCN on. Or perhaps they dumped them through exchanges Is there a chance some of these old-school exchanges are still functioning? Whats a BCN dark-web exchange rate? Maybe someone from the veterans will shade some light on this matter.

There are BCN bagholders/early miners who have tens of billions of Bytecoin...A few individuals own a combined 100billion Bytecoin..

and what about those 3 stages that coincided with new users arrival. Must have been some kind of major updates or sudden spike in prices or even a new miners team joined in. Keeping in mind that BCN might have been of academic origin, chances are that a new scholastic community had jumped in. New whitepaper could be the reason too. Is it possible to pinpoint these time periods or stages to figure out the actual events behind them?

I wish I knew the answers to these questions. IMHO the assumption that new users influxes were associated with new mining teams appearance is the most reasonable.

it makes sense now. the new mining teams theory seem plausible enough.