Quote from: Coinsy on June 24, 2014, 03:54:57 AM

Quote from: nzminer on June 24, 2014, 03:31:08 AM

Quote from: gentlemand on June 23, 2014, 09:02:36 PM

Quote from: Totem22 on June 23, 2014, 08:59:06 PM

Quote from: TaunSew on June 23, 2014, 08:41:11 PM

I don't buy from anonymous developers who name themselves after a coin. So Kora is out for me.

As well many coins have copied NEM's distribution model and failed to drum up interest. NEM isn't some Communist or freebie coin. NEM is an initiation to a new economic movement.

+1. Kora is not the first. NXT lite was the first copy of the distributional model. But i guess there are more to wide distribution. Where is aurora coin now if the success is to give the coins to many people as possible?

NXT would be way up there if its beginnings hadn't been so botched. Screaming about distribution is still the first thing that comes out when people discuss it.

Seriously, the difference between NXT and NEM stakeholders is zilch.
Its still a small percentage on a global scale.
Distribution is NOT why ive invested in NEM...

There's actually a huge difference. With NXT you have 70 stakeholders who forge gobs of NXT daily just by holding, and with NEM you have 3000 stakeholders who are incentivized through POI to do the exact opposite of holding.

Even if you hold 1 million NXT, you dont get much by forging, seriously, check out the calculator, you might get 100NXT a month