Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 07:14:10 AM

Quote from: stealth923 on June 24, 2014, 07:09:44 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 07:05:23 AM

Quote from: stealth923 on June 24, 2014, 07:04:08 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 06:58:56 AM

Quote from: illodin on June 24, 2014, 06:55:40 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 06:25:35 AM

Ps: the original bet makes no sense, it says that XC has to increase by 1200% within the next two months while DRK has to stay still.

It was you who made the claims of XC being ahead of DRK wasn't it?

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 06:25:35 AM

My bet still stands. 10000XC that XC will grow more than DRK over the next two months. Meaning its a better investment.

That's a retarded bet. If I win and XC goes to zero I win 10000*nothing lol. How does that bet make any sense?

Well, it should be. After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

Quote from: AlexGR on June 24, 2014, 06:43:59 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 06:25:35 AM

You guys know that people can steal coins from DRK aswell? That's why there is a 10 DRK limit?

Lol

You are confusing DRK (trustless) with XC (trusted transactions - undoing Satoshi's work). The node of DRK doesn't own your coins. It's the "lawyers office" that signs the agreement that the two parties want to change coins. It only signs the agreement.

The number 10 is used for identical inputs that increase obfuscation. If everyone puts 10 in, how can you know who put what?

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/56b3b95b76995d3e4d3107cf753c8496493010f625fc04d971e9262d74e6a5a5

That's the reason, not because coins can be lost. The plan was to increase denomination pools (10 / 100 / 1000) etc - so the limit would be then 100 or 1000, depending the highest pool. However changes in spec might move away from denomination pools.

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 06:25:35 AM

I mean, we do have better Dev's, technology, and plans. The only thing DRK has is media exposure and a Dev who couldn't fix a lightbulb.

Trusted transactions = inferior tech. Sorry. Satoshi invented trustless transactions for a reason and XC destroyed trustless transactions and marketed them as ...innovation.

Question. Once rev 2 comes out and XC is trustless, what's your arguments going to be then?

Edit: DRK coins can currently be stolen

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/

Quote from: eduffield

and supports the hot/cold setup for masternode operators (allowing your money to not be risked at all.).

So, until DRK fixes its fork, all DRK coins transferred through darksend are at risk. That's why the maximum darksend limit is 10, not the bullshit excuse you posted above.

LOL im crying laughing at how stupid this guy is.....hahahaha

I'm crying laughing at watching how blind you are to the obvious

I mean, there are shills, and then there are you guys.

I'm counting down the minutes until Rev 2 is released and I can ask you guys to name a single advantage DRK has over XC, while ill be able to name quite a few in the opposite direction.

Should be fun.

What you dont realise is we are just having fun with you - no one cares about XCacheJosh Coin anymore...you can release anything you want, it will just be tumbleweeds, all thats left are a few core shills who are holding on tight to the grave. And you are one of them

Lol. Brush off the obvious.

Ill ask again, once rev 2 is released, and XC has better technology across the board, has a better Dev, and has much bigger plans for the future, and a team that can back it up.

What will DRK have apart from first movers advantage?

You don't think XCs price will spike like DRKs did when people realise there is a MUCH better alternative?

Seriously. This is like saying google was a small company that would go nowhere while holding yahoo shares.

Also, DRKs position isn't set in cement, the altcoins market is constantly changing, if you think all because it did anonymous first it's going to still be around in two years then your blinder than Steve wonder

So narrow minded - you can keep your technology that you "hope" will be superior. Monero has better anonymity, look how far its gotten, not far. Why - because it doesnt have the whole package. Technology is a small piece of the pie.

XC's reputation is a pump & dump and thats where it will stay, the market confirms this. The damage it has done to investors by confusing everyone with XCache and how the Dev did not address the FUD around loljosh has put the nail in the coffin. Let alone you claim it to be 100% anonymous by offering 1btc reward for a few hours and claim its uncrackable. No one takes the coin seriously. Chaeplin proved a hard-link and the dev just brushed it aside - good way for an investor to feel comfortable.

Not to mention the copy paste from Fedora, and how the dev cannot use github, do you think investors are stupid. They would take one look and know its another copy/clone CINNI/CLOAK/RAZR basket. Dont fool yourself! Denial is a bitch.