Quote from: illodin on June 24, 2014, 09:08:51 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 08:49:27 AM

Quote from: illodin on June 24, 2014, 08:33:48 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 07:58:21 AM

Quote from: illodin on June 24, 2014, 07:50:39 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 06:58:56 AM

After rev 2 we will have better tech, better Dev's and much better plans for the future.

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 24, 2014, 07:33:09 AM

Ill ask again, how long do you think DRK can stay as a market leader once Rev 2 is released and its competitor has MUCH better technology across the board, a MUCH better Dev, and MUCH better plans for the future?

"MUCH better" is highly debatable imo, when you consider the following timeline:

- XC thought that transferring the actual coins to xnodes was a good idea
- when the trust issue was repeatedly pointed out, it was decided that a "dynamic trust model" would be implemented to fix the issue
- when the flaws in that model were pointed out, it was decided that it's better to follow what DRK did, and implement multisigs so the nodes couldn't steal the coins

It looks to me like XC is following DRK's lead and not the other way around. This can be 100% confirmed after XC announces plans to add collateral.

I donno. I don't see DRK racing to implement anonymous messaging, staking mobile wallet APPs or PoBC.

And those are just the features that have been leaked.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=575013.0

That's all extra fluff on top of the basic functionality (and btw, DRK is not a PoS coin so it doesn't need "staking mobile wallet"). Maybe it would be best for XC to just concentrate on those extra features and fork from DRK if they're gonna follow its lead anyway so they could at least get the fundamentals right.

Fundamentals? After Rev 2 our fundamentals will be allot more anon and secure than DRKs. This isn't in question. Even Chaeplin has admitted this

You guys seem to think spending six months to build something which a better Dev can build in six weeks makes your fundamentals better, it doesn't.

Dan has developed world first in technology and spearheaded program's for the likes of IBM.

All because you spend six months writing poorer code doesn't make it any better. To put this in perspective, Evan has taken two months to implement a failed fix for the masternodes, while dan got this working in less than two weeks without a hitch and moved on.

Infact, I'd even argue our fundamentals are even stronger, I mean, how good can your fundamentals be when what was a 'simple' fix has now taken two months to implement, and it has even yet to be done correctly, especially when XC built the entire thing from scratch in less than two weeks without even batting an eyelid.

Seriously, lets not talk about fundamentals. Once Rev 2 is out every single argument about fundamentals you have all posted in this thread goes completely out the window.

So, ill ask again. Name one advantage DRK will have over XC apart from first movers once Rev 2 is released? Just one.

Yes, the fundamentals that for example prevent nodes from stealing the coins. If the "fudsters" didn't point it out XC wouldn't have thought of following DRK's lead and plan to implement multisigs. There's a little bit more to those fundamentals still and we'll see if XC chooses to follow DRK again.

Funny how you forget DRK can have coins stolen aswell. Something which seems to go quietly under the radar here.

And yes, Dan chose a different system after a major community backlash. That still doesn't stop the fact he will have created a much more anon and secure system in the same time it's taken Evan to fix one 'simple' issue.

Are all your arguments after Rev 2 going to be based on things that didnt happen?

I seriously can't wait for Rev 2. I'm going to come here and remind you all everytime you post here that your system is flawed and most importantly, lacks the competence to fix it. Ill probably even head over to the DRK thread just to really push the issue.

Also, I think you all forget when you say XC is just copying DRK system, that DRK just copied Greg Maxwells coinjoin system. You have zero moral standpoint on this whole copying issue. The only difference is Dan is working on actual innovative features, things that have never been done before, while Evan has just got someone else's ideas to function properly, then fails at implementing even the most simple feature on his own.

I understand your fustrations against answering my question of naming one thing after Rev 2 that will make DRK better than XC, It must seriously hurt you guys knowing one guy beat in a few weeks what took DRK six months to build.

Anyways, please.

Answer the question.

One thing DRK will have that will be an improvement on XC after Rev 2?

I've already got about six or seven lined up for why XC is better than DRK once Rev 2 is released, but ill leave them to an infographic I'm gonna pump into the DRK thread everytime anyone even mentions XC.

Fun times.