Quote from: cryptosminer on June 24, 2014, 01:02:41 PM

Quote from: platinum4 on June 24, 2014, 12:41:50 PM

Quote from: badman74 on June 24, 2014, 09:50:39 AM

Quote from: bullus on June 24, 2014, 03:29:57 AM

Great work Slix and Batman Wink

will test around after work..I appreciated as a windows user Grin

Can u give us a example of a working config with pools and profiles?

this works perfect for me
sgminer.exe -c nicehash.conf

nicehash.conf :

Code:

{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "NH x13 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1;f2=.5;f3=9.5;f4=6.8;f5=750",
"profile" : "x13"
},
{
"name" : "NH x11 multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=.01;f0=1;f2=.5;f3=9.5;f4=6.8;f5=750",
"profile" : "x11"
},
{
"name" : "NH keccak multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4338",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=64;f0=1;f2=.5;f3=9.5;f4=6.8;f5=750",
"profile" : "keccak"
},
{
"name" : "NH scrypt multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4333",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=64;f0=1;f2=.5;f3=9.5;f4=6.8;f5=750",
"profile" : "scrypt"
},
{
"name" : "NH nscrypt multi",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4335",
"user" : "1AHDnxrDrPkP7mPNPbhx3LsQTXZuXvbFAA",
"pass" : "d=64;f0=1;f2=.5;f3=9.5;f4=6.8;f5=750",
"profile" : "nscrypt"
}
],
"include" : "profiles.conf"
}

profiles.conf :

Code:

{
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"intensity" : "18",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-powertune" : "30",
"worksize": "128",
"gpu-engine": "1040",
"gpu-memclock": "1400",
"gpu-fan": "65-100"
},
{
"name" : "x13",
"algorithm" : "marucoin-mod",
"intensity" : "18",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-powertune" : "30",
"worksize": "256",
"gpu-engine": "1040",
"gpu-memclock": "1300",
"gpu-fan": "75-100"
},
{
"name" : "scrypt",
"intensity" : "16",
"gpu-powertune" : "10",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads": "1",
"algorithm" : "alexkarnew",
"nfactor" : "10",
"gpu-engine" : "950",
"gpu-memclock" : "1100",
"gpu-fan" : "85-100"
},
{
"name" : "nscrypt",
"intensity" : "16",
"gpu-powertune" : "10",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads": "1",
"algorithm" : "alexkarnew",
"nfactor" : "11",
"gpu-engine" : "950",
"gpu-memclock" : "1100",
"gpu-fan" : "85-100"
},
{
"name" : "keccak",
"intensity" : "14",
"gpu-powertune" : "10",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"gpu-threads": "2",
"algorithm" : "maxcoin",
"gpu-engine" : "1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1300",
"gpu-fan" : "75-100"
}
],
"hamsi-expand-big" : "1",
"failover-only" : true,
"shaders" : "2560",
"gpu-vddc" : ".95",
"temp-cutoff" : "96",
"temp-overheat" : "94",
"temp-target" : "88",
"auto-fan" : true,
"auto-gpu" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "2",
"shares" : "0",
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"no-restart" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"show-coindiff" : true,
"remove-disabled" : true,
"extranonce-subscription" : true
}

How the hell does this .conf not start at 100% fanspeeds?

I copied this character for character straight into two .conf files, EXACTLY as badman74's. It works but fires up at 100% which is intolerable so I didn't let the mining instance continue.

And I tried to add gpu-fan : 0-0 in the main profiles.conf, still 100%

I would like to ask you if you have correct string in password?

"d=.01;f0=1;f2=.5;f3=9.5;f4=6.8;f5=750"

I think that you've mixed relative values with absolute
I don't know if I understand it correctly with this string you try to say to NiceHash server that you mining rig speed is: SCRYPT = 1 Mhs, ScryptN = 0.5 Mhs, X11 = 9.5Mhs, X13 = 6.8 Mhs and Keccak = 750 Mhs

changed password string to match my factors, shouldn't matter.

fanspeeds load at the max of a range, if you specify no range, it loads at a constant. looks like ystarnaud might be looking at this sometime later today; he said he noticed something in the older code, and should be able to push a fix/patch