Quote from: BTCNeverSleeps on June 26, 2014, 01:40:47 PM

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 26, 2014, 01:35:47 PM

Ok... If you are really saying that it DOESN'T bypass blockchain completely, then WARNING BELL is completely ringing off the hook, because look at point #6....

Let me repeat it here again for you...

6. The new wallet is then sent to the receiver via the BurnerConnect connection. The blockchain is bypassed completely!

Do you know how the fundamental of blockchain work? How do you send coins from one address to another bypassing the blockchain? Please do explain...

So... does it or does it not bypass the blockchain?

In point #6 he is 100% correct. He IS bypassing the blockchain completely when sending the wallet(with coins inside) to the receiver. There isn't a record in the blockchain that person A is sending person B those coins.

Ok, so when Person A sends these many transactions to these wallets, it DOES create a transactions into say S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 right?

And... then you send these wallets to person B?

So, if person B then go and buy drugs online with these S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 or Person B sends these coins to wallet C and then spend the money illicitly..., wouldn't the tie back now goes back to Person A?

You are the source of this original funds that was created from wallet A afterall.... I don't know how much more hard link this can be.

If Chaeplin from DRK saw this... he would go nuts....

ps. If you don't know who Chaeplin is..., he's a troll from DRK that goes around XC thread and FUD all over the blockchain saying there's hardlink this hardlink that and after rev 1.5 can't do it any more so he went quiet.