Quote from: pbremen01 on June 26, 2014, 11:03:45 PM

Quote from: StonerStanley on June 26, 2014, 11:01:32 PM

Quote from: Perl++ on June 26, 2014, 10:35:58 PM

I'm a developer and i don't see any problem with the anon technology of this coin.

+1

ccryptcoin already told us that implementation will differ from the whitepaper.

But will the final implementation have the same issues as the implementation proposed in whitepaper? Nobody denied that.

You must learn how programming works, problem exposed in that reddit article is very simple to repair

1 problem / 1000 solutions.

Cheesy

Quote from: pbremen01 on June 26, 2014, 11:17:54 PM

What? Are you trying to say that I denied that the final implementation will have the same issues as "whitepaper" one? Where did I write that?

How should I know whether the final implementation will have the same issues or not? I'm not in dev team.

I think that the devs were explicitly asked about these issues with whitepaper but they didn't answer.

ccryptcoin said:

Quote from: ccryptcoin on June 21, 2014, 12:51:41 AM

Our anon features are well underway - we are being secretive because the simplicity of the idea is beautiful and we don't want it stolen yet. It will likely be open source after release.