Quote from: embargar on July 03, 2014, 11:32:16 AM

Quote from: BitcoinWisdom on June 27, 2014, 03:31:59 PM

Quote from: embargar on June 27, 2014, 01:57:40 PM

Quote from: BitcoinWisdom on June 26, 2014, 03:13:40 PM

Quote from: embargar on June 26, 2014, 02:47:02 PM

Thanks for a huge update!
Any plans to add more exchanges, particularly hitbtc?
Sometimes I do arbitrage. For this purpose I use btc-e, bitstamp and hitbtc exchanges. But hitbtc' absence makes arbitrage more difficult.

hitBTC's trades is abnormal obviously, so it would not be supported.

I have not noticed any abnormal activity on hitbtc while trading.
Its trading volume and history seems legit.

Here is an article about it that on Reddit
http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/25mpbf/hitbtcs_volume_is_very_suspicious/

Thanks for a link, haven't heard about it.
But everyone can wright anything in internet.

Currently hitbtc' market data seems legit, just check:
Maybe I can't figure out what is abnormal, please tell me if I'm wrong.

Not only for that link. Actually those abnormal exchanges such as hitBTC, itBit are added locally. I've monitored hitBTC for months and have dozen of evidences. The last checking is about a week ago, still has abnormal trades or bid/ask. and I'm not going to check the exchange anymore.
Here is previous talk about hitBTC and this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=190722.msg6447750;topicseen#msg6447750