Quote from: mdude77 on June 28, 2014, 06:25:56 PM

Quote from: windpath on June 28, 2014, 06:16:03 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on June 28, 2014, 05:40:33 PM

I suspect making P2Pool work with proxies will fix both.

I notice the bounty is specifically for forestv though, and not other contributors.

I am also leery about sending funds to some random guy on the Internet too Wink

The bounty is for Forrest or his designee, my goal here guys is to create a reward based system for Forrest that provides financial incentives for him to get back into development of p2pool outside of a donation % from mining.

While I may appear to be "some random guy" I hope the work I've done so far on the front end has demonstrated some level of commitment to p2pools success. I'm a real person, and plan to stick around, trust has to start somewhere, phillip if you contribute some coin you have my word it will either go to Forrest if the Ants work by July 25th, or will be returned to you. Yes, it's a risk, and my intent is to build some trust for future bounties, not to make off with anyone's Bitcoins

I tend to agree with others... the bounty should be available to anyone who comes up with a working solution. Not just Forrest.

M

totally agree, don't like the tone of forrestv's recent messages (although I do agree that developers should be rewarded).
forrestv seems to think the word 'donation' means something other than it's meaning;

A donation is a gift...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donation