Quote from: suppersz on June 29, 2014, 02:29:00 PM

Quote from: Vertcoin on June 29, 2014, 02:20:09 PM

Quote from: suppersz on June 29, 2014, 01:59:11 PM

Quote from: Jiggy0001 on June 28, 2014, 07:14:24 PM

Quote from: BorisTheSpider on June 28, 2014, 06:58:53 PM

Stealth addresses are now live on MON mainnet. VTC release will follow once further beta testing has taken place in MON, so please help to test.

http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/298wpl/monocle_stealth_address_release_candidate_1/

tell us... how can you defend your developments and innovations from the takeover by exe?

it is hard to understand how did it first. exe coin devs claim to be the first in this place... so what is the deal?

Quote

http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/execoin-vanguard-asic-free-zone/2014/03/23

2014/03/23
Improving Anonymity of Execoin

Quote

https://twitter.com/execoin_dev/status/482941288975970304

Jiggy0001 ‏@Jiggy0001
@fukukami0 @execoin_dev is it just an accident or why do you release the same features at the same time with vert???

Fukukami ‏@fukukami0
@Jiggy0001 @execoin_dev Vert. announced stealth in qt client. We have released electrum-exe already, and are adding stealth addresses to it.

Jiggy0001 ‏@Jiggy0001
@fukukami0 @execoin_dev ok, it just seems to be that unfair claim Sad

Fukukami ‏@fukukami0
@Jiggy0001 @execoin_dev We already have support for stealth in mainnet, just no gui for it. Stealth in #execoin were planned a long time ago

Jiggy0001 ‏@Jiggy0001
@fukukami0 @execoin_dev ok, then sorry for that!

That's why I said, always and always, we have said since February 20
2014/02/20
http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/vertcoin-developer-paul-bradley-talks-zerocoin-asic-resistance/2014/02/20

We released in Testnet since June 10
2014/06/10
http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/27rfhk/stealth_address_alpha_testing_testnet/

I also like VTC Grin

I just don't want that people attacked EXE.I think they are also hard work.EXE dev did not said that they are first.Just i and another people said 'First Electrum with Stealth addresses' Grin

https://github.com/execoin/execoin/commits/master/src/script.cpp
As I saw from here, it was commited 6 days ago.
Guys, we have to do something, this coin did the same things since Electrum http://www.reddit.com/r/Execoin/comments/28gbrn/psa_electrumexe_steals_code_without_attributing/

Quote

http://cryptocoinchronicle.com/2014/06/execoin-innovates-plus-giveaway/

Stealth library in Python is ready, integration of stealth addresses generation into mnemonic system used in Electrum has been completed in full, weve done sending/receiving part in the wallet as well. Currently we are working on modifying Electrum server to support fetch_stealth method. Within 1 week or so a fully functional beta version will be available in the mainnet.
Our network has been upgraded already to the extent sufficient for relaying stealth transactions. Relevant updates to the source code have been committed on June 23, pool operators are encouraged to upgrade their execoind daemons in order to speed up stealth transactions in the network. We already submitted a dozen of stealth transactions to the blockchain, here is one of them (use one of the block explorers with txid given below):
Stealth address: ExkdTFkYbBh4evi5zQnmxg2JFmE3Pc6xDYMKsHeaQizfYooL1Ac9V2YvtDu4mKfAAcdDouw1ac8JkeN vsaYV6mfhsfywzHGzcugtzc
TXid: 0499732cacc82d80ef5ea06565e4d3464b54a4135b9130667dcf35766077fe97
Ephemkey: 03327b0e2f1c0378f39a6ba4c2a42e9cdac951bc137353a5e74e08b6b9c6eeee6e
Scan secret: 79a29d3c9c35ad81ce5ce5dea1386dd721357369b8fc3ba465efe5842bad1b49
Spend secret: 51a757426c6f440033c79391166375a6d0699a736f8e6bfc548781fc5d422eed
We are giving the secrets, related to stealth address, to our readers, there is 5000 EXE reward to anybody who will manage to redeem it.
In fact, being given with the secrets, its a fairly simple task, so, before trying, make sure that the reward is still there!

Quote

Here is Txid, they said in the news (http://cryptocoinchronicle.com/2014/06/execoin-innovates-plus-giveaway/)
http://explorer.execoin.net/tx/0499732cacc82d80ef5ea06565e4d3464b54a4135b9130667dcf35766077fe97 (2014/06/25)

What did you said?Did you said 'From address:EgCMLc4gYtR4UJK5GnnsJyc9XgP6TFBbZ4' and 'To address:ESyia1VPbThowJc6vyL278M5X1Cz4G7zHA'?
I think it's impossible

You don't know what you are talking about.