Quote from: CLains on June 29, 2014, 02:45:05 PM

Quote from: nethyb on March 06, 2014, 12:56:09 PM

Quote from: CLains on March 06, 2014, 12:26:16 PM

LAST THREAD IDENTICAL TO THIS ONE WAS CLOSED BY PAGE 8!

SEE FOR YOURSELF HERE.

Great work CLains, thanks for pointing this out.

Also see that this is one of a number of idential threads that have appeared.

Quote from: eCop on March 10, 2014, 12:04:53 PM

why this thread is not locked, while other simillar was

Quote from: toast on June 29, 2014, 12:39:21 AM

Interesting... before there was a donation BTC address asking for money, now it is not there?

Quote
First of all, interested. Not really sure if is a scam or not, but just in case.

Secondly, why is there a fee? If you are just forking an open source software, what exactly do you need it for?

Are you using an escrow for the fees? Since this is a new account, you can't expect to be trusted with any money.

Quote from: doc12 on March 03, 2014, 12:35:42 PM
Hi , i'm interested ! Like the whole Bitshares idea, also will get ~10BTS when the wallet is out ....

You mean Bitshares? Coz this one is NOT Bitshares. If you are investing 10 BTC in this without any proof, well, good luck.

Scam？Why?We r not the bad duplicators,we r just the followers.We have our own development team,after we deeply understanding the code of bitshares,we will make it perfect，and then develop BTF .LTC follow BTC, BTF follow BTS,we work on it.

The Bitshares developers do hard work on technology development,we will do hard work on marketing,that's the difference.

Anybody could develop a DAC as bitshares,why could we？We sure we will do even better.

The fee is few,when BTF is released,maybe 1,maybe 2 is more than that.

I see this as a natural occurrance. Noone can "force" them to follow the bitshares usage license, can they? I would definitely be comfortable (barring any extra, damning information) with another Development team coming in, honoring the creators and original investors and cloning BTS initially--then developing variations. The more ethical clones there are, the better imo (as long as they show appreciation to those who sacrificed for it).

With that said, I'd gladly push for you to be able to chat with the community to see how collaboration can take place as opposed to a fishy thread with no escrow. If you cannot be ethical enough to honor the consensus, though, then there is no real reason anyone should trust you will even give them something in return for the donation.