Quote from: Benefactor on June 29, 2014, 09:40:42 PM

Quote from: voluntarist500 on June 29, 2014, 06:30:26 PM

So if this belongs to someone in the community please let me know so we can set the record straight.

I'm not on top of the blockchain evidence referred to with this one, but I do know us posters have already stepped on some toes inappropriately and also somewhat damaged investor/trader participation with recent comments.

Nobody can be required to respond, as some people value privacy, discretion, etc., much more than others. Parties are truly unknown, and we don't even know if they will be reading this thread. They could be anyone.

(Please disregard, if the blockchain evidence is clear, etc.)

-

My off-the-cuff impression of this account (udNPskm7dR7viHsBE1XTjb6jF26676j8Lz) is of a small-scale accumulator, but I have no idea. Sad if that's another inappropriatedly offended person.

-

If anyone doesn't understand the meaning and implication of the term "witch-hunt", please review it. Thanks.

well, we didn't really step on the toe of anybody. The person remains anonymous. It helped us understand uffG was the cryptsy-account of the thief and we were able to understand and proof coins were sent directly from coinex-adress to cryptsy and dumped on that market. We know this now with certainty. I think it was worth the inconveniences.

Those other referred adresses all received Un after the 'hack' occured and actually nobody was able to withdraw as far as i know. Furthermore they received exactly same amounts as another adress.
The 'witch hunt' should come to an end now. All we wanted to know was if there remains stolen Uno to be dumped on the market and how much.
I think we did a good job in uncovering what was to be uncovered.
Let's lay the hammer down on this one, i agree. We know enough now. Sorry for any inconveniences that were possibly caused for investors.