Quote from: devphp on July 01, 2014, 08:22:14 AM

Quote from: smoothie on July 01, 2014, 08:19:27 AM

You forgot to mention not well tested "superior technology".

Testing older technologies proved they are vulnerable. Now what?

Quote from: doo on July 01, 2014, 08:20:44 AM

Now we sunk to pure trolling level.

Oh, did I say a blasphemy about the almighty Bitcoin? I am sorry. So if I really think it doesn't have much upside potential, is this considered trolling? Why? Even one of Bitcoin developers sold half of his Bitcoins, because he doesn't feel confident Bitcoin will win the race due to its flaws, what other signs do you need?

Vulnerable? Care to be more specific?

I was talking about how some of the newer more "innovative" coins have not been around enough to be claimed to have stood the test of time. There is always the possibility there is a serious flaw in the implementation.

Hence why I always say that any crypto needs to stand the test of time. Give a coin a year at least before saying the code is sound and secure.

Otherwise you are being naive to think coding is perfect from day 1 and since it has been "running good" for a short period of time that it is better than the older coins.