Quote from: rdyoung on July 05, 2014, 02:53:20 PM

Quote from: gweedo on July 05, 2014, 02:25:55 PM

Quote from: rdyoung on July 05, 2014, 02:22:42 PM

Quote from: gweedo on July 05, 2014, 02:18:09 PM

Quote from: simonk83 on July 05, 2014, 08:44:23 AM

Quote from: pyramining on July 05, 2014, 08:03:25 AM

Quote from: schnaiwiyi on July 05, 2014, 06:50:43 AM

Who did get back his inital investment with this?

There are actually 3755 deposits "completed" (it means they received the deposited amount + bonus), on ~11000 total deposits.

Pyra, how about pausing any accounts that are currently in profit (anything over their initial investment) so the rest of us have a chance.

What? This makes no sense... people in profit need to be punished for the laws of bitcoin...

So your all for the socialized aspect of this endeavour when it helps you? But when its time for someone else to profit just a little its a giant hell no?
You remind me of the politicians who say we need to get rid of medicare/medicaid/etc, then they take advantage of it for their parents or themselves even though they are already millionaires who can afford healthcare.

No I am all for keeping the terms, that I signed up and agreed to on the site. You guys are the politicians something isn't going your way, you want to bend the rules and make it work for you.

Thats a giant load of BULLSHIT and you know it. I am a round 1 asic investor and am nowhere seeing a profit, while those that were in at the beginning with fpga have seen plenty of profit and then some. The early investors got bonused with 2 rounds of asic while those of us in round 1 have seen very little. You don't want your money faucet turned off even if for just a short while so that others who weren't fpga investors or don't have a ton of referrals can see some of their money back.

I too would have been fine with him leaving things as they were, extrapolating out we would have seen our individual hashrate begin to grow as deposits/accounts were cleared out. BUT he made this change so here we are. The whole point of the design of pyramining seems to be to share the earnings with the group rather than an everyman for himself setup. But here you are arguing against the share the wealth when it doesn't suit you, but I would bet if the shoe was on the other foot you would be requesting exactly what we are, either split the extra hashrate with 100+ deposits, everyone, OR pause the older deposits that have seen a major fiat return. Considering that deposits got smaller as btc rose, it won't take as long to clear out the deposits that haven't profited at all and then your cashflow can be turned back on.

Quote from: gweedo on July 05, 2014, 06:52:42 AM

Quote from: schnaiwiyi on July 05, 2014, 06:50:43 AM

Who did get back his inital investment with this?

I did, and no I will not disclose the amount.

Then what is your malfunction. If you received at a minimum 100% return and you deposited when btc was sub 100$ you made at a minimum a 600% fiat based ROI, and you still have the remaining 10% along with anything left from referrals. Act like an actual human and let those of us that have only received 1% or so of our deposits see some return.

Mommy can't save you, welcome to life, cause I was invest the second day this was open then I should be punished. Yeah ok... Let me also give back all my bitcoin profits to everyone in fiat.