Quote from: Scriptiee on July 07, 2014, 09:37:39 AM

Quote from: dreamspark on July 07, 2014, 09:28:30 AM

Quote from: LaudaM on July 07, 2014, 09:15:04 AM

You're talking nonsense. I was talking about the age now you switch to other random information that everyone should know by now.
Nice argument.

I have no interest in arguing with you, literally 0. In fact I'm not even sure what your argument is, compare the age of BTC, LTC and DRK is not a valid argument as to whether the coin will increase to its ATH again. That only holds water if you believe that it has the longevity of BTC and LTC and I provided reasons why I dont think it does (see first crypto, first accepted alt), the "other random information" are real arguments as to why it may not go to ATH again or has a long life ahead of it. In reality the fact that I think LTC is also dying doesn't really do your argument much favours either if such an old coin can dwindle away. Yawn, the alt section is littered with exactly these sorts of comments "Don't worry the coin is still young compared to BTC".

The difference between LTC and DRK is LTC not bringing anything new to the table over BTC. The decreased block generation time, increased maximum number of coins, different hashing algorithm are tiny improvements. The coin only gained value due to ASICs entering the race. It was a save heaven to the miners that could no longer get a ROI.

DRK is bringing a lot to the table. Darksend, Masternodes so far, and it's still open to hardforks if major changes are needed/planned. This is a massive thing that differentiate it from LTC and BTC, both of which are against hard forks. This means we can still make ground breaking changes to the coin where LTC and BTC are as is.

'dreamspark' - unable to comprehend innovation. Spot the irony, eh? Tongue