Quote from: salmion on July 09, 2014, 05:50:14 PM

Quote from: rygamble on July 09, 2014, 05:33:19 PM

Quote from: salmion on July 09, 2014, 05:31:42 PM

Quote from: rygamble on July 09, 2014, 05:26:05 PM

Quote from: T.Stuart on July 09, 2014, 05:19:55 PM

Quote from: rygamble on July 09, 2014, 05:09:15 PM

Quote from: T.Stuart on July 09, 2014, 05:07:42 PM

Sooo... does the amount you have staking affect the percentage of anon transactions you process? How does it work?

That I don't know. Things will be much more clear in a couple days (beta testing is about to start).

All I can say is this. True anon is generally considered to be impossible or very complicated to achieve. Logically, this means work, and a lot of it, before an anon system has real value. The core Dark team is several people strong, with a dozen more helping with testing and other work. They have been working hard for months. This means the system being built is robust, and will continue to become more so. I do not believe there is a quick solution to anonymising transactions.

They've been hard at work for weeks on this system with 4 full time members and 2 part time. Definitely not a quick solution haha

But you can't tell us how PoSa works?

I answer that specific question because PoSA hasn't been released to the public yet. Feel free to browse the white paper though.

Sorry I'm picking on you. We had cloak trolls on here earlier today.. whereas you are having a conversation.

I've read both whitepapers but didn't find anything concrete on the how. Which is something the Dark Devs do explain. A little bit of transparency goes a long way in trusting an anon solution.

Agreed. I'm definitely looking forward to the details that should come to light with the beta testing.