Quote from: eduffield on July 07, 2014, 11:39:02 PM

Development Update - July 7th

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/development-updates-july-7th.1735/

Quote from: eduffield on July 10, 2014, 08:18:18 PM

Quote from: shojayxt on July 10, 2014, 07:57:27 PM

...

Darkcoin FUD

Sorry to hear you lost faith in the project. Also, sorry you're going to be getting out at a horrible time (right before I announce I have EVERYTHING figured out to make Darkcoin mainstream?).

Over the past couple of days, I've made huge leaps in the Darksend technology. In fact, RC4 will be the final solution to Darkcoin's anonymity. The client will automatically look at all of your funds and it will be able to tell which funds are not anonymized, if it finds non-anonymous outputs it will run them through a darksend with other clients. After that process, users can send without Darksend using the anonymous outputs for instant transactions without waiting for other nodes (with no upper limit on transaction sizes).

The other thing you're missing is that there is a reason I forked Bitcoin. Adoption for Darkcoin will be MUCH faster and easier for vendors, because all of the APIs are the same.

Expect more news in a few days. I have lots of work to do, but soon we can start testing all of this new functionality.

Quote from: shojayxt on July 11, 2014, 01:59:34 AM

Quote from: shojayxt on July 11, 2014, 01:51:16 AM

If DRK is widely accepted and used as a payment option what happens if I buy something using DRK and the merchant says they never received the payment? What recourse do I have to prove I actually sent it to them since the transaction is anonymous and can not be tracked in the blockchain?

Anyone?

Not a problem with darkcoin but it is with the cryptobloat coins you are promoting, true story. Not sure about the other 2nd tier anon vaporware P&D coins though.