Quote from: porqupine on July 12, 2014, 06:02:35 PM

Quote from: Litoshi on July 12, 2014, 05:48:22 PM

Quote from: porqupine on July 12, 2014, 05:10:45 PM

Quote from: dzarmush on July 12, 2014, 05:09:21 PM

Quote from: porqupine on July 12, 2014, 05:04:31 PM

Quote from: Wulfcastle on July 12, 2014, 05:02:56 PM

Quote from: porqupine on July 12, 2014, 04:53:52 PM

I'm offering a bet of any amount up to 1000 XCP to any participants that Crypti does not have a working reference client and is Vaporware.

Quote

Stas Oskin: "The source code of the complete project and following updates will be provided in quarterly releases. This will protect buyers against early clones."

Method of Proof:
A hash of the current Working Private Code is embedded into the Blockchain with Multisig or OP Return. A Counterparty Binary Bet is made on a Broadcast of a trusted-third-party with a deadline three Months from now when their code goes public the trusted-third-party broadcasts the outcome.

Bitcoiner from Xbet.io has agreed to facilitate this Broadcast (though I am open to other trusted-third-parties) - with the following match conditions:

Quote

bitcoiner (xbet.io): if what we need to do to decide the bet is check that hash, this is something that is possible. we cannot however check the insides of the code and assess their difference from nxt
bitcoiner (xbet.io): i think we can do something like this - we will download the code, run it, if we are able to perform a send from one client to another, and the source is in node.js like stas said, we will decide that stas wins. if we cant run it or we cant send from one client to the other or if the code is the same language as nxt (what is that btw?) you win

There's a BETA client available....

test.

Then don't go spamming your Vaporware outside of the forum thread, and I won't be here. Also if you actually do have a product thats up to 4.5 free BTC for you at 0 cost, so feel free to step up.

Don't spam your vaporware outside of your forum thread and I wouldn't be on here. And if you actually do have a product that bet is up to 4BTC at 0 cost for any of you. So feel free to step up.

I don't see any BETA client, I see a closed Source Wallet which might be running on an SQL server or directly on NXT testnet for all I know.

Ok, it's vaporware. Now go

I wouldn't be here if you weren't spamming your Vaporware outside your thread. Also if you really do have a product, that's up to 1000 Free XCP on the table, so feel free to step up.

P.S. I'm not a troll, I'm the http://xcpfeeds.info developer. One of the persons involved in the development of Cryptsi Pump and Dump project was advertising it in Counterparty Chat. I responded by asking him to advertise his Vaporware somewhere else, and he insisted it is not Vaporware - Hence I'm offering Public Terms for someone to prove me wrong.

BTW Counterparty was an original protocol with the code Open Source on Day #1.

If you read the other 70 pages here, you will see that I am one of the biggest critics of this coin, and I have not been shy about posting my comments, but...........

1) I dont see this as vaporware. It is obvious that the devs ARE trying to launch a coin

2) they are developing a unique algo using java nodes, mainly because the dev is a java programer

3) they are really really trying to get this going

However:

4) they are attempting to get their money upfront, rather than waiting to see if the coin is a success, thus transferring the risk of failure from the devs to the investors

5) they offer a coin into a very crowded market, without a marketable niche feature

6) their coin cannot be mined, only purchased in the pre-sale or exchange

7) all 100 million coins will be available on the first day of the launch, with maybe 40-60million hitting the exchange first day

Cool

there is nothing to prevent them from walking away from the coin later.

The obvious point is that NXT doesn't have a real non-exploitable PoS algorithm. And Cryptsi is here claiming they are going to deliver 3 more on top of that. If they as much as had a solution for the nothing-at-stake problem that was non-exploitable of course it would be huge, but do they have a solution for that and these other algorithms they are claiming they can have? I'd give it a .1%, but unfortunately that's not something I can bet on directly.

Read white-paper please. Our PoS is not Nxt PoS. And we didn't use Nxt Transparent Forging. On next week we will install new nodes and start PoS for all guys who sent to me test passphrases.

Technical white-paper will be posted later, before IPO finished.