Quote from: badman74 on July 13, 2014, 01:54:20 AM

Quote from: coins101 on July 13, 2014, 01:13:20 AM

Quote from: toknormal on July 10, 2014, 11:09:30 PM

On the other hand, keeping them separate (the anonymity layer and the blockchain layer) has some huge advantages. In particular, as we've already seen, it allows the blockchain layer to retain legacy compliance and compatibility with commercial APIs while at the same time liberating the anonymity layer so it has the capacity to evolve rapidly in response to real world use. We've already seen this happening - we've seen how much flexibility there is having the functional layers decoupled. If you weld them both together, your "stuck". You can't evolve the properties in one without being ball and chained by legacy interfaces in the other.

I've had this itch for a few weeks now.

There must be a way to separate the MNs income from their owners control of their MNs that generate that income, so that you would create bearer bond type payments into a REIT type structure, so that you could IPO MN income?

If there is so much potential that could be derived from MNs, giving them extra income, this would make a great investment stock. Perhaps a PE of 10 to 15.

Just can't quite figure out how to separate control of the network infrastructure from the MN income to prevent problems with removing decentralisation.

Anonymous corporation stock might be the only way.

edit

maybe its a simple as using cold storage and multi-sig

i would like to be able to have payments diverted to a different address than the masternode
kinda scared i will break the MN trying to get income out of it

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/masternode-operators-faqs-needed.1695/#post-11562

Use coin control

Code:

It's a feature in the QT wallet enabled by going into the options menu.

So say you have a MN that was selected only once. You would see the single input of 1000 for the MN, and another input with only 1.

With coin control, you can select only the 1 and send it to a new address not affecting the MN 1000 at all.