Quote from: yourstruly on July 13, 2014, 04:46:20 PM

Quote from: sdmathis on July 13, 2014, 04:44:55 PM

Quote from: yourstruly on July 13, 2014, 04:42:12 PM

Quote from: Subtuppel on July 13, 2014, 04:30:49 PM

Quote from: Rekatan on July 13, 2014, 04:21:06 PM

I personally am very excited by this. I know this may be a scary time for the people who currently have VRC missing, but think of the precedent this is setting!

Never in the history of money has there been the ability to just "Rollback" to a point prior to a theft. This is like if bank robbers got away with 2 million dollars, and the next day the money was back in their vault, while the robbers are now magically holding worthless monopoly money.

This really has the potential to change the way that the world sees crypto - it is a tangible benefit that fiat money will never be able to provide. If it goes off smoothly I have no doubt we'll see this in Forbes at the minimum, since they already are fairly crypto-friendly.

you need to think a bit more:

not only the "robber" is punished, but everyone else who bought coins for BTC/FIAT between the hack/whatever and the time of the rollback, and everybody who sold will still have their coins + BTC/FIAT.
If you call that a good situation you should not be allowed to handle money at all.

This is without a question a terrible solution, and should not be done.

There are no good solutions. The devs had to choose the lesser of two evils.

No they picked the worse of two evils, they just proved this coin is completely centralized crypto and it will screw over countless innocent people.

After extensive review of your posts, I have come to the conclusion that you quite literally do not know the meaning of 'centralized'. Please stop posting, as the effort you are expending to type is wasting my perfectly good oxygen.