Quote from: BetVIP on July 14, 2014, 05:39:21 PM

Quote from: The_Gloomfrost on July 14, 2014, 03:36:53 AM

Quote from: Peeps Place on July 13, 2014, 10:00:42 PM

Quote from: mybtclove on July 13, 2014, 06:06:13 PM

peeps, Your work on rating is an important one.

I do however see that there is room for improvement in the standards by which you rate the books -

the period of time being in business is important but consider this:

If one betting site has superior technology or more features it should be rated higher.

for example, xbet.io are in business for over a month now and they are using an escrow technology that makes them the most honest book in existance. even if they want to take money from their bettors they can't do it.

you are not even rating xbet.io which is a shame.

Thanks mybtclove. I'll look into them. Is anyone playing at xbet at this time? Need some more feedback.

FYI Peeps xbet is plagued by shill accounts - check out his post history; there's about 3 of them (that I've seen) crawling around the forum, last time I checked out xbet their site was down so I couldn't test but I am pretty annoyed at the obvious shilling.

Their World Cup markets are still up and they have literally 2 sports, looks like a one-man job. These kind of operations should have no place competing with the professional sportsbooks out there today.

You make a good point in that these one man shops should not be rated with the professional shops.

Players - Is anyone playing with BetVIP? They have met the time requirement for an upgrade but feedback is definitely wanted before making any upgrades.