Quote from: boki15 on July 14, 2014, 06:47:57 PM

Quote from: ticoti on July 14, 2014, 06:32:15 PM

Quote from: boki15 on July 14, 2014, 06:19:07 PM

Quote from: ticoti on July 14, 2014, 06:15:45 PM

Quote from: boki15 on July 14, 2014, 06:06:23 PM

Quote from: ticoti on July 14, 2014, 02:44:17 PM

Quote from: Mr.Joker on July 14, 2014, 02:42:52 PM

Quote from: niki25 on July 14, 2014, 02:36:30 PM

That 400ghash net so powerful

400GH with this algorithm isn't that spectacular.

400gh with an algo without multipools fgpa and asics i think it is really incredible

400/16=25

Compared to scrypt performance, 25GH nethash isn't really much. I am on solo and finding enough blocks with 10 gpu's. I would even stay on solo until nethash reaches 100*16=1600GH, that would be time for a pool.

why do you invent that 16?

If you look at the speed your gpu works on scrypt and compare it to the same settings on nist5, you'll recognise that the difference is ~16 times (depends on how your gpu is tuned):
1mh scrypt = 16mh nist5

that is only if every miner has the latest drivers(in beta) and i think few of the miners have it

Don't forget updated miner. I don't care if people are driving slowly whatever the reason is (probably not enough time to stay up to date), I like new and fast cars so I am always driving fast with latest car.

I don't care what you want to drive,but don't make mistaken comparisons