Quote from: cinnamon_carter on July 14, 2014, 11:25:35 PM

the longer numbers and block time are a great idea, not sure i would favor a riecoin 2 , I am still trying to research methods to mine riecoin

Also I am unconvinced that features of anon tx will hold water

Most that claim it are false now.

Obviously a good area for future research....

would be better to make your choice if you could check out that gpu miner on testnet of primecoin vs. see a demo

i do agree future technology will continue to increase what are the present limits of hardware ect...

Quote from: gatra on July 14, 2014, 10:13:32 PM

Quote from: primer- on July 14, 2014, 07:03:25 PM

Quote from: Q1WaR on July 14, 2014, 07:01:39 PM

if so then please write it like Ric² Wink

+1

...and add RAM requirements (shinycoin) to make it a truly a CPU-only coin.

I like Ric²

But right know I don't know how to make it more RAM demanding... (that is, without radically changing the PoW). After seeing the alleged speed of primecoin's gpu miner, I think that a Ric gpu miner will eventually be unavoidable. Newer GPUs will keep getting more and faster RAM anyway.

I was thinking of making the nonce (offset in the block's header) be 512 bits long instead of 256. This would allow for more efficient mining putting us closer to the elusive world record.

Also 5 mins per block: the wallet would sync faster and each block would have more difficulty, getting us closer to that record....

Yea. I agree. Why make a new coin when a perfectly good coin already exist and needs improvement?