Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][MULTI][VARDIFF] Pool|TradeMyBit - 0.5% Prop/Profit Swap/Auto-Exch
by
MobileWill
on 15/07/2014, 03:04:46 UTC
Is ~6MH/s okay for a R9 270X?

I am also getting

R7 240 1.6MH
R7 250 353K/s (Which is odd, it should be higher than 240. Maybe Int is too high)


Edit: Int 14 helped a bit instead of 15. But should be higher hmm.

Which algo on the 270X? I get 8.4 MH/s on NIST5


NIST5, dang really. What settings?

"intensity" : "18,17,17,17",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,6401,6401,6401",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "64,64,64,64",
"expiry" : "1",
"queue" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1130,1120,1120,1110",
"gpu-memclock" : "1450,1350,1350,1350",
"gpu-fan" : "80,65,65,65",
"kernel" : "nist5",
"scan-time" : "3"

The last 3 are my 270. I don't have the 270X. The first settings are my 280X so don't use those for the 270X lol

Wow, tiny worksize. I was trying 256 right now and it helped, trying your settings now.

Wish I had the kill-a-watt still connected, its on my Fury rack.

Edit: Thanks!!!  So much better! Wish I had spent the time playing with it sooner but I probably would of never tried 64.

Code:
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "1200,950,950,1000",
"gpu-fan" : "45",
"gpu-memclock" : "1350,1000,1000,1400",
"gpu-powertune" : "10,10,10,20",
"intensity" : "17,14,14,17",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"worksize" : "64,64,64,64",

Strange that the 240's do better than the 250. Which makes them more efficient since they use hardly any power.