Is ~6MH/s okay for a R9 270X?
I am also getting
R7 240 1.6MH
R7 250 353K/s (Which is odd, it should be higher than 240. Maybe Int is too high)
Edit: Int 14 helped a bit instead of 15. But should be higher hmm.
Which algo on the 270X? I get 8.4 MH/s on NIST5
NIST5, dang really. What settings?
"intensity" : "18,17,17,17",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,6401,6401,6401",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "64,64,64,64",
"expiry" : "1",
"queue" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1130,1120,1120,1110",
"gpu-memclock" : "1450,1350,1350,1350",
"gpu-fan" : "80,65,65,65",
"kernel" : "nist5",
"scan-time" : "3"
The last 3 are my 270. I don't have the 270X. The first settings are my 280X so don't use those for the 270X lol
Wow, tiny worksize. I was trying 256 right now and it helped, trying your settings now.
Wish I had the kill-a-watt still connected, its on my Fury rack.
Edit: Thanks!!! So much better! Wish I had spent the time playing with it sooner but I probably would of never tried 64.
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "1200,950,950,1000",
"gpu-fan" : "45",
"gpu-memclock" : "1350,1000,1000,1400",
"gpu-powertune" : "10,10,10,20",
"intensity" : "17,14,14,17",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"worksize" : "64,64,64,64",
Strange that the 240's do better than the 250. Which makes them more efficient since they use hardly any power.

You can definitely set your core clock to 1100 on the 270X and get much higher hash rate too.