Quote from: whonesta on July 18, 2014, 03:14:36 AM

Quote from: jonnybravo0311 on July 18, 2014, 02:30:41 AM

When you setup the fixed address, did you do it at your router by mac address, or on the S3?

EDIT: Never mind... I re-read what you wrote. Since you included the comment about setting up the DHCP server, you obviously didn't just put a static IP in the S3. Duh... sorry about the stupid question back at you.

Yes by MAC @ your router..

Well after 5 hours of testing all I have to say is BLAH!! Overclocking even with 4 PCI-e connections does little.

218.75 Clock:

miner 1 / 444.95 @ Miner / 463.36 @ Pool
miner 2 / 427.78 @ Miner / 432.18 @ Pool
miner 3 / 443.52 @ Miner / 454.49 @ Pool
miner 4 / 410.05 @ Miner / 410.58 @ Pool --- Indicates 1 chip as " - "
miner 5 / 427.41 @ Miner / 413.85 @ Pool

250 Clock:

miner 6 / 464.32 @ Miner / 479.65 @ Pool --- Indicates 1 chip as " x "
miner 7 / 450.27 @ Miner / 417.84 @ Pool

will continue to mess with timeouts to see if anything works as for now not getting a stable 441 GH/s, but on a few. ;(

Hope B2 is better!

please try to underclock to 215.625

and to 206.25

the above codes were from my hand calculations, GH speeds added. 215.625 gives me 1100Gh and less than 1.1% error rate

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589429.msg6485048#msg6485048

so 206.25

and 215.625 were both developed by klondike_bar

   option 'freq_value' '6206' #215.625M
   option 'chip_freq' '215.625'
   option 'timeout' '18' maybe 17

   #option 'freq_value' '5002' #206.25M
   #option 'chip_freq' '206.25'
   #option 'timeout' '19' maybe 20

these 2 can be tested