Quote from: btcdrak on July 19, 2014, 12:45:23 PM

Quote from: Revelation on July 19, 2014, 12:44:09 PM

Quote from: Len on July 19, 2014, 12:28:13 PM

Quote from: Revelation on July 19, 2014, 12:11:30 PM

Quote from: Len on July 19, 2014, 12:02:59 PM

I take it you mean cashing out, and no it doesn't. If he had no interest in pursuing the project he could of just left with the BTC straight away and not even bothered with the distribution of the coins, let alone constantly responding to the same questions over and over

Awesome logic. Thank you. I should then buy the stocks of the companies when their CEOs are cashing out completely. Hey, but wait a second, that doesn't work in financial markets. It has to be that financial markets are dumb.

Last time I'm replying as you have clearly made your mind up already. You must have some ulterior motive to be so passionate in dedicating so much of your time into something you think is a bad investment.
Dev couldn't of won in this situation as if he bought into his own IPO people would have complained, if he would of kept some for himself people would have also complained. You can't please everyone, someone is always going to be unhappy and It looks like that person is you this time. Bad luck, jog on.

I will pass on. I will just say this -it is an unheard story with a CEO/founder selling his whole stake in his company/coin leaving him with no vested interest. It is a wishful thinking that this CEO/founder is driven by non-pecuniary motives and will run the business by putting much effort, as the IPO was all about money.

Have you read this? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=699278.msg7908476#msg7908476

I am talking about your incentives. Your post is just explaining why there will be no dump from the dev on the market which doesn't mean that you have any vested interest in the coin.
Are you telling us that the buyers should buy the coin because there will be no dump from the dev and not because of the future?
Thank you, I am out.