Quote from: Peter Todd on July 22, 2014, 08:14:09 AM

Quote from: ABISprotocol on July 18, 2014, 04:15:17 AM

1) If there is an avenue for zerocash developers to work more closely with bitcoin, what does that look like? Does it mean that @imichaelmiers & @matthewdgreen (on github) could be invited to work directly on the bitcoin protocol, and have the ability to make commits along with yourself, Gavin, and others?

I've been hired as an advisor to the Zerocash team, and likely will be doing development work as well. There's not very much need for Zerocash developers to be working closely with Bitcoin at this stage, although in the future that may change.

As for "ability to make commits" - there is no need to try to "grant" that ability, and in any case, those with commit access the https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin repository have no special powers in practice. If anything I personally would consider that access an annoying burden, not a useful thing to have.

Thank you Peter, it's great to hear you weigh in on this. Myself and many others are definitely looking forward to the progress on this. I'm also curious to hear your thoughts on "Output Distribution Obfuscation" and BRS as elucidated on fairly recently (July 16 2014 if I am not mistaken) by gmaxwell and Andrew Poelstra, at http://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/wizardry/brs-arbitrary-output-sizes.txt and the possibilities that the BRS-based solution may have for future bitcoin development as well.

And if you have time please also add any thoughts you have on this Github issue:
https://github.com/pmlaw/The-Bitcoin-Foundation-Legal-Repo/issues/19
The thread on Github is getting rather long but the proposal is fairly simple.

Cheers,

ABISprotocol