Quote from: Wolf0 on July 24, 2014, 03:30:26 AM

Quote from: Marcus2914 on July 24, 2014, 03:25:22 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on July 24, 2014, 01:57:33 AM

Quote from: Marcus2914 on July 24, 2014, 01:55:30 AM

Quote from: skunk on July 24, 2014, 12:12:42 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on July 23, 2014, 09:42:48 PM

on Kepler, around 15% better.

on my kepler card (12x48) it's ~10h/s worse...

What hash rate are you getting with that card? I have a GTX 660 SC 2GB that's getting ~220 H/s using 16x40 . That's on both Tsiv's latest and Wolf0's latest is ~230 H/s.

Good to hear some good news, finally Cheesy

EDIT: That new middle loop seems to perform about the same, sadly.

Just a quick question Wolf. What version of Cuda Toolkit are you using? I have it compiled with 5.5

6.0. Also, I made the scratchpad pointer in the second loop restricted, it seems to provide a small hashrate bump.

~~Okay, I will pull it and give it a test on my card.~~

Update: The new one did give me a boost to an avg. of 235 H/s in the miner. Average at the pool is 250 H/s.

Update 2: I decided to compile a new version of tsiv's. I am getting 255 H/s on the miner and 280 H/s at the pool.