Quote from: coinsolidation on July 24, 2014, 04:45:17 PM

Quote from: Este Nuno on July 24, 2014, 04:04:13 PM

Quote from: cryptozim on July 24, 2014, 02:03:43 PM

My understanding was that Mark was going to continue working on the Bitmark core project unless GetMarked was funded with 8 BTC.

Just want to point out if/when getMarked is funded he said that month would cover any and all work on Bitmark Core. Full time focus on both is the package as I understand it.

Correct, getMarked has already been funded with 0.9 BTC, and I am on Bitmark full time until that runs out or more replaces it. Let us remember that getMarked is Bitmark. We are here to use everything stable and mature we can on the core, maintain the core, add new things if they are really needed, and spend all the time we can focussing on adoption.

Gotcha. I read your resource allocation as split between Bitmark/side work for income/family time, and that funding GetMarked was part of the side work. As someone who gets distracted easily, and gets excited about new things, I projected that onto you based on my understanding.

I will say that you have been extremely prolific in getting work done on Bitmark projects. Most other devs that I've seen on here would have taken 3x as long, or there would have been critical bugs with their releases. I will be donating a little more to the Bitmark Foundation later today.