Quote from: SpeedDemon13 on July 28, 2014, 12:37:01 AM

Quote from: zlibz on July 28, 2014, 12:26:10 AM

The tor implementation is as follows:

I was going to first setup a tor relay node that you can enter in your wallet's socks5 network entry. Then I was going to look at stealthcoin's source and use it's implementation to add it to the coin. I was in the process of doing it until all this drama happened. It just takes some time as there are alot of files do edit.

Now here is the other option. Since you guys are sticking with me I was thinking of releasing another coin which will be a clone of stealthcoin (because it already has tor implemented) however, I will tailor the X13 algorithm back to X11. That way the tor implementation for DarkCash would be the relay nodes that could be used in conjunction to the new coin.

This coin will still get the anon transactions developed as that is also a real idea which is not far in reach. It is a lot to work on but I am trying to work with you guys. I will also open a moderated thread in the next few minutes.

So in short, your abandoning this coin? True, deadlines in the crypto world are tentative, but you should try to stick to them as close as possible. Making another clone coin just to get a feature that you can fork into this coin would be more respectable. Doing this might hurt your credibility.

what credibility this noob have? fraud stanford no amaze, fake facebook account with copy pasta profile pic. same thing with coin stealing ideas and innovation from darkcoin and copypasta from many coin. guy no developer in sense of word. guy is copy pasta

mewmewmew out