Quote from: BugSpirit on July 28, 2014, 04:33:11 PM

Folks, what I've read in 10 latest pages is some kind of hellish nonsence.

1. You propose some "companion coin" to COLLECT PEOPLES FUNDS for development and bounties. Know what? People don't like when their fund are collected even for saving the world. This is the clear scam for the majority which will only push the public away completely since as you probably know, Quark already have at least questionable reputation.
I have a big question considering this situation. If you have a viable community why the hell it needs some questionable technical stuff to simply organise and collect some funds? If you do need this stuff for such a purpose you don't have any viable community which could actually do something visible apart from covering each other with crap on forums.

2. Don't like BIG WALLETS for them doing nothing for you? Have a bad news for you: they are part of the game as they didn't break any rules. And changing the rules will ruin the Quark for everyone it will become clear that it could be changed again and again at any unpredictable way. So I advise to kill you envy and carry on.

3. Just why you unleashed such a baiting on Kolin? Someone even said that he ruined all our efforts. If one guy on forum ruined all your efforts in something it's not his fault it's your fault for you deeds are so miserable.

Let's imagine a situation. I'm a big wallet and I want to devote some of my millions to a community project as I'm interested in Quark succes. And I'm wandering around and look. To whom? On which project? Where is even a tiny guarantee of its success? You demand them to participate in "community efforts" but where are they? All you're doing is building castles in the air, fighting forum trolls and blaming each other for the losses.
Now you probably understand why big wallets escaping, fiat and bitcoin investors don't uppear.

I'm writing this not to insult someone. Just look at yourselves and think what could be done today and in future to help the quark and each other. Everyone could do something.

Still, we have GitHub repository:
https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark
Not everyone able to code and write tests, but everyone can write faqs, tutorials, make translations to language you know.
We have trello boards:
https://trello.com/b/1hBBvhoE/quark-planet
https://trello.com/b/HatkOwER/merge-mine-to-support-the-qrk-network-project
https://trello.com/b/tswQsadm/the-iceland-project
https://trello.com/b/DG6wKzQu/eve-online
Please don't be shy and help people there. Or offer some project by yourself. There our community could establish more civilized discussion without troll fighting and crap throwing.
Even Shibe-stile promoting in social networks forcing stupid memes will bring more than half of this topic.
If everyone devote 5 minutes of his or her precious time to this Quark eventually rise and shine. Yes, it's that simple.

Hellish nonsense??

1. You propose some "companion coin" to COLLECT PEOPLES FUNDS for development and bounties. Know what? People don't like when their fund are collected even for saving the world. This is the clear scam for the majority which will only push the public away completely since as you probably know, Quark already have at least questionable reputation.
I have a big question considering this situation. If you have a viable community why the hell it needs some questionable technical stuff to simply organise and collect some funds? If you do need this stuff for such a purpose you don't have any viable community which could actually do something visible apart from covering each other with crap on forums.

I don't agree at all. I would give 10% of my quark to a transparent wallet used only for projects and to pay for development BUT only if others will also. Why should we give donations when the huge wallets will give nothing and stand to gain the most??

Let's stop arguing with people who just say blanked statements based on assumptions of what others do or don't like.

Let's get specific. Tell me one disadvantage of having a development pot that is transparent and funds used only for the development of qrk and qrk services?

People don't like their funds collected even to save the world does not apply. We are collecting funds to save their financial destruction not save the world.

However yes we can't fork and take peoples qrk away from them, that would be seen as changing the rules, but yes we can think of ways to get them involved and contributing to claim the new companion coin.

QRK needs funding all the core agree on this.

No successful new coins have emerged in the last 6 months where there is not an active dev with funding behind them.

Also i was not saying donators need to give 200k. What i meant was for those who will be elected to lead qrk forward should have a personal holding of qrk that gives them loyalty to our project.