Quote from: sed on July 29, 2014, 05:27:13 PM

Quote from: espringe on July 28, 2014, 09:01:56 PM

Quote from: sed on July 28, 2014, 12:57:23 AM

Quote from: espringe on July 25, 2014, 04:52:58 AM

If you want to give it a try without commitment, there's a builtin faucet that gives out 2 bits (2 millionths of a bitcoin) an hour.

I'm checking out your site, but FYI there's a weird typo in the OP (bolded above). A bit is a unit of information. I think you meant a 2 μBTC (sometimes written ubtc in ascii). The other normal way of saying this 200 Satoshi. Cheers!

I was motivated to use 'bits' by http://blog.bitpay.com/2014/05/02/bitpay-bitcoin-and-where-to-put-that-decimal-point.html

I can't stand using BTC as the base currency, I find numbers like 0.00004 are completely unreadable and unrelatable to -- while on the flip side 4,000,000 bits isn't hard to read. I'm not against to using μBTC, but that doesn't seem where momentum is heading -- so I'm jumping on the 'bit' train, and hoping others will follow =)

Wow, ok, thanks for catching me up on that. I, personally, find it absolutely nuts to adopt an already in-use unit and apply it to bitcoin. I think that everyone knows what a bit is, it's a unit of information. Ie a 1 or 0 in a computer memory. It's a true or false. To me, the idea of saying that 100satoshi is 1"bit" is a little like saying, let's say that 100 satoshi's = 1meter. How that is suppose to alleviate confusion, I have no idea.

Anyway, nothing personal, but I certainly won't be following this trend. If for somereason, microBTC is too abstruse, what's hard about 200satoshis?

Sorry if I derailed your thread about the social platform gambling.

i agree with Sed, i prefer using satosi rather than bit.
Bit can be represent as binary digit that can make someone confuse a bit for the first time player Tongue

But if someone has familiar with your site, i think it's not a big deal.

Overall i like this betting site,simple, unique , attractive ,fun, and sometime made my heart beating so fast Grin