Quote from: Macno on July 29, 2014, 08:25:40 PM

Quote from: shojayxt on July 29, 2014, 08:15:43 PM

Like I've said before. Darkcoin will be used mainly to do things that are against the law. So you just made a case for using Darkcoin to break the law and proved my point.

Lets see an example of a mainstream merchant like Dell accepting Darkcoin? Oh wait they process Bitcoin transactions through coinbase which falls under FinCen regulations. I'm sure that they will be quick to adopt DRK. Not!

But hey, a bunch of gambling addicts will be able to gamble online without getting in trouble. That's the future of Darkcoin. Nefarious activities. Not mainstream adoption.

I did not follow the whole discussion but I don`t quite get the fuss and name-calling. I actually agree with shojayxt in general and I`m absolutely fine with that.
The only term I would oppose is "nefarious", as I do not see gambling or drug consumption or the wish for financial privacy or some other victimless "crimes" as "nefarious" , but that`s a matter of taste. To hope for mainstream adoption for DRK seems pretty far fetched to me but again, I do not care. I have BTC for that.
My only concern would be that another anon-coin takes the lead and DRK becomes Betamax while XYZ-Coin becomes VHS.

QED

That is why the trolls are here. Not because they care about putting the world to rights, but putting their agenda on the map.

We have seen them all here, undermining DRK because they have been paid to troll or they have stakes elsewhere.

Why would you expend so much energy, practically every minute of the day posting in a crypto forum?

QED, thank you.