Quote from: synechist on July 30, 2014, 12:50:21 PM

Quote from: hoertest on July 30, 2014, 12:17:31 PM

Quote from: synechist on July 30, 2014, 11:58:17 AM

Quote from: hoertest on July 30, 2014, 11:53:55 AM

I know that its all hot air atm. good luck to anyone trying to ride the pump. i don't have the balls anymore Grin

.

one more thing. I'm all for giving value and recieving value type of actions in this crypto community. Tell me where is the value keycoin devs is giving to XC in exchange for Dans time except that one line thank you so far?

The point is that Dan's review is the value given to XC.

- it establishes Dan's reputation in the community

- it demonstrates his spirit of mutual respect and goodwill

- it further solidifies XC's reputation as a real, legit project

- it gets Key members interested in XC.

Best move ever on Dan's part.

Guess you talked him into it. You are way to invested in this whole mutual generosity Dalai lama of Business thing. I'm all for respect but its to much, and yes i would like to see some more effort from key devs personally.

And after all he has accomplished you consider this his best move ever ? Your priorities are off

I had nothing whatsoever to do with that review. I heard about it when the rest of you did. Dan did it entirely of his own volition. So there goes that theory.

Secondly, though I'm not personally that into the Dalai Lama, if you're using him as an exemplar of ethical conduct then yes, it's damn well correct that we should be ethically exemplary. It's a HUGE competitive advantage.

If you disagree, that's fine with me. I'm not interested in enforcing compliance of belief.

But can you just drop this issue now? You've been simply repeating yourself for a few pages.

ok i stop with it. we don't have to agree on everything. 90 % is fine Cool

PS. RW-scott u totally misunderstood my post. I'm 100% shure we have the best tech.