Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 30, 2014, 01:01:29 PM

Quote from: aerobatic on July 30, 2014, 12:44:25 PM

iCEBREAKER. I own 100 TH of hashfast hardware and its running at approx 65TH for most of the time, a significant reduction of its promised performance. And the ones they made in the lab to demo don't count as they were hand built by experts and choice parts were used. I have real ones, and they don't perform that well. and since the company doesn't exist i can't rma the slow ones and have them fixed. Mine are professionally hosted by LiquidBits and Netsolus.

And what is the expected vs actual hashrate for your CT gear, if you don't mind my asking?
My handful of Sierras all work at slightly over to well over spec speedwise (I don't monitor power use and they're overclocked to just under the edge of stability).
Including RMA candidates in your larger sample skews the data. Sorry you can't RMA them, that sucks!
If you want me to possibly fix and optimize/host your dead/slow units, I have free power and plenty of space.

Quote from: Bargraphics on July 30, 2014, 01:44:04 PM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 30, 2014, 09:43:33 AM

...

Really Ralph?
Why are you posting on all of these threads again? I was under the impression you traded most if not all of your shares for HashFast gear and were no longer considered an investor in this company.
If HashFast followed the correct queue that would mean you still haven't received anything and should be helping creditors instead of harassing them.
Of course since you worked for HashFasts tech support department maybe the above scenario is different. :|

Someone seems to think that Icebreaker was supposed to be the person helping you get your Hashfast gear running. That is kind of ironic isn't it?