Quote from: drkman on July 30, 2014, 05:27:08 PM

Quote from: tokyoghetto on July 30, 2014, 05:10:06 PM

Quote from: drkman on July 30, 2014, 05:06:04 PM

Quote from: Coolstoryteller on July 30, 2014, 04:51:57 PM

Your question was answered pages ago. CloakSend 1.0 was anon through exchanges. CloakSend 2.0 is anon through an extension of the PoS protocol (PoSA). If you read the OP you wouldn't have to ask this question.

Not really. This post was the first to even try to provide a competent response. Plan 1 anon was abandoned and now we are on to plan 2 anon PoSA which could be big but is only in whitepaper status.

WOW. Now I know you are really FUDDING. Stop playing stupid. Cloaksend 1.0 WASN'T abandoned. It was implemented. PoSA isn't whitepaper status. PoSA was closed beta up until recently where it went PUBLIC BETA. PoSA is real deal Holyfield.

Stop playing stupid, its getting old. Your questions have been answered. You haven't bothered to read anything. You are clearly a Darkcoin shill. okthxbai

"Main advantage of using exchanges for anonymity: Hundreds more transactions going into an exchange than a node, some of these tx take weeks to come out. This means that it renders statistical analysis (which can uncover so called anonymous transactions) much less effective. Result = stronger anonymity, straight from your CloakCoin wallet."

So how does Cloaksend 1.0 use the exchanges that takes weeks to come out... Huh

If this is integrated in Cloaksend 1.0 as you claim.

I posted my results from the PoSA beta in one of my posts. If you really know what you are talking about, you would check my PoSA posting and the subsequent results and realize PoSA works, bottom line.. IT IS NOT WHITEPAPER STATUS ANYMORE...

Take time to SEARCH the thread before posting garbage.