Quote from: ManeBjorn on July 31, 2014, 04:40:27 AM

Sorry I understand now. I am not sure why Dmxl is finicky. Maybe an update will fix it.
So you went 240 on your X6 that is very interesting results. I stayed at 280. I will try going to 240 as well to see if anything changes for me.

Quote from: qiqiji on July 31, 2014, 03:41:23 AM

Quote from: ManeBjorn on July 31, 2014, 03:17:22 AM

I wish I knew why it is not working for you. Have you tried the Zeus image and put the correct amount of chips and 280 to make sure it is not a bad miner?

Quote from: qiqiji on July 30, 2014, 04:15:07 AM

Quote from: ManeBjorn on July 30, 2014, 02:30:01 AM

They use the same chips but different freq and lower power to achieve the results.

Quote from: qiqiji on July 30, 2014, 02:20:48 AM

Quote from: cryptofunk on July 30, 2014, 02:03:54 AM

Clock of 240??

EDIT:
~~I think stock is 328 and most run it at 340.... maybe that's your problem, it would explaine your low consuption at the wall...~~

I take that back, I had the X3 in mind...

--ltc-debug should be --zeus-debug but it not help, still 99% HW

i think X3 and X6 use different usb chips then

so, why X3 can use CGminer Dmaxl Zeus while X6 can only get 99% HW ?

of cause my zeus miner is fine, zeus's img works fine, minera's bfgminer woks fine too ( before is my bad to set wrong clock to get 20% HW )

but with CGminer Dmaxl Zeus i only can get 2M/each and 9x% HW, i wonder why

PS: my zeus is HURRICANE X6, power-reduce version, 64chips, 240Mhz, 9-10M Hash power, 230W on wall ,not X3 which is 328Mhz or so

i found new sweet spot for X6 is 224 ( or 228 ), i get 9.5M each, HW around 5%, 450W ( 2 of them, using Super Flower 550W Gold )
240 is also 9.5 ( or 9.6 -_- ) each, but HW is around 15-20% even more, 470W ( 2 of them ), i think those up 20W is just used for those HWs Wink