Quote from: RoadStress on August 01, 2014, 03:19:42 AM

Quote from: ZiG on August 01, 2014, 02:56:07 AM

Quote from: RoadStress on August 01, 2014, 01:46:56 AM

Quote from: bitcoinbearhk on August 01, 2014, 01:38:29 AM

http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/products/sp30-yukon-september-batch-2

Power Supply: 2 x 1200W
Power Consumption: 3000W

Huh

WTF

By the way, I don't like the idea of 3000W for 1 machine ... I live in 13A@220V zone, meaning 3000W JUST exceeded the supply of 1 socket ... thus the machine will need 2 sockets, wasting the socket slot.

Also, putting too much into 1 machine means when a small part in it fails, the whole machine fails. Where as if I split into, say, 10 x S3, it's more robust, more deployable, and flexible.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=718831.0 Read here for more information about the PSUs.

As for you exceeding the supply of 1 socket I just posted a link above where you can find a place to host your miner probably with cheaper power costs than yours.

Also if a small part fails the whole machine won't fail so you don't need to worry about it. I am sure that each chip is independent and if one fails the others can continue running without problems. The SP10 units have 192 chips in them organized in chains of 8 chips for a total of 24 chains. Collider has a unit where a chain of 8 chips failed, but he is still getting over 1.4Th/s with that unit. Each SP30 miner has 30 chips in it.

RoadStress...are you already on SP-Tech payroll... Huh

I am just wondering, because you are so furiously jumping on everybody with critical remarks of SP-Tech...that is kind of strange...

Or maybe 1% commission of your group buy in miners...like 3-4 SP30 reward...I guess... Wink

...and don't try to bash me...Just tell us the truth..."it will set you free"... Grin

Cheers,

ZiG

I am not on their payroll. I just have plenty of spare time and I'm using it to lurk the forums. This is the second (or third?) remark that I'm "furiously jumping" people who have critical remarks of SP-Tech and again I don't see anything wrong in my quoted post. I did read my post again and I see nothing wrong. I may be pissed that people are not reading the last posts or at least the last 1-2 pages before posting and they are asking questions that were answered just a couple of posts above, but besides that I just offered information.

Please tell me what from my quote makes you think that I jumped furiously on bitcoinbearhk because of his critical remarks. I'm a bit confused right now.

Hey RoadStress...

I am NOT trying to get involved in any debate / fighting over your posted "information"... or ...etc... Grin

BUT...obviously you are VERY biased in favor of SP-Tech...

My questions was very clear...What is your COMPENSATION for doing these "bent-overs"... Huh

Nothing else... Wink

Cheers,

ZiG