Quote from: pbremen01 on August 03, 2014, 08:29:04 PM

Quote from: Xponential^ on August 03, 2014, 08:19:07 PM

From the key sub and what I have gathered here this seems to be the story line. Correct me if I'm wrong. It was talked up early. Took off for a short time. Rogue Dev and others fudded it back down. It survived. Still holds steady. Many of the Devs at Key are also involved here. Feet up, drink in hand, awaiting the mindfox bomb. All in due time

Before this "roque dev" fiasco there was "security analysis" fiasco (anon method proposed in a whitepaper can't work at all) that probably caused the first drop.

After this "security analysis" and before "rogue dev" the pumpers posted "fake" news about btc-e.

Still holds steady? Did you check the price and the volume on Mintpal? 24h volume is almost 0.

This coin is dead from the trading point of view. Only the working and flawless anon implementation can resurrect it.

Such a sad fudder arent you? What bias info.

You act as though it went up because of BTC-E news. Wrong, it shot to 270k BEFORE btc-e news. BTC-E news did nothing for the price, went from 160k to 210k back to 160k, then Attious fudded and dropped it to 60k. There was also no "fake news" about BTC-E. The news was clear, they were in talks with BTC-e which was true, but after attious fud and its drop, it wasn't gonna be added.