Don't take my comments too personally as I never meant to be insulting with my questions.

I have indeed watched some of those lectures, went to the corresponding websites and read the material, and researched many other marxist/socialist/RBE/communist/Ect.. sources over the years. The reasons I pressed on some of the details for the decision making process was not because I didn't review those answers already in your source material but rather to point out how your proposed system necessarily depends upon violence and coercion through the decision making process. My repeated attempts to ask you were either avoided or denied because understandably you don't want to believe it fundamentally does.

You claiming that I'm a capitalist fundamentalist is a little odd when I have claimed there to be many legitimate flaws in capitalism. I could create a long list of these flaws starting with the fact that pure capitalism doesn't address many concerns well with structural violence, wage slavery, waste and instability through exporting the costs of externalities, and wealth accumulation. Some of these concerns I have begun to address so you can see that I have indeed considered these problems and have a nuanced approach.

I could present a more honest and direct rebuttal to my politics on your behalf in a few sentences as I do understand the arguments:
"Yes, while coercion is used in the consensus process of resource allocation that is a necessary tradeoff because the suffering, loss of efficiency and harm to both people and the environment is far greater if we lived in a society where individuals were not held accountable to a social contract. While curtailing certain liberties, these social responsibilities are not only better for society as a whole but raise the standard of living of individuals and may even afford certain liberties to the individual which they might not have had if they lived in a society with strict ethical boundaries with regards to the NAP."

That would be one example to a fair rebuttal to my position. I would disagree with such based upon the fact that there lacks evidence that the suggested frameworks are superior and fail to solve the problems they intend to address. I would also acknowledge that just because communities who have abandoned currency have failed in the past does not necessarily mean that your proposed formula would fail as well. Thus, I am genuinely interested in you setting out to fulfill your dreams and create a test case example. This is partly due to my curiosity for a new data point and one can always learn from successes and failures. 

Your resistance to want to try and fulfill your dreams is a little odd but I won't press you further on it because you seem a bit touchy with the subject matter.