Quote from: Beliathon on August 07, 2014, 03:30:49 AM

First of all, property IS theft. The theft has already occurred, long ago and continues to this very day. All property owned today can be traced directly back to violent acts in the past. Every square inch of land on this continent (Americas) once belonged to nature, and later to indigenous peoples that were murdered in genocide.

Just go right ahead and ignore all my previous comments of how Anarcho-caps have a more nuanced view of Land property rights than you are leading on.

Quote from: Beliathon on August 07, 2014, 02:34:05 AM

Typical capitalist fundamentalist, always concerned with payment first, leaving compassion as a distant second, if at all.

This is a hint that you don't understand arguments made by Anarcho-caps/Voluntarism. You have made several accusations that we lack compassion and are only concerned with payment/profits. You are thinking too simplistic and making a false dichotomy as anarchists claim that charity through violent coercion makes society unhealthier and thus harms everyone, but especially the middle class and poor.(There are many detailed reasons for this).

I don't view you as a 2 dimensional Socialist/Communist who is a lazy pot smoking welfare recipient who greedily wants to steal from the rich, I do genuinely believe you think that your politics will enrich not only yourself but society as a whole and I understand the reasons why you think so. I can see that you don't afford the same level of respect to attempt to understand the details of our position, right?

Quote from: Beliathon on August 07, 2014, 03:30:49 AM

If "Life and Liberty" are truly our birthrights, than the requisites for Life must be provided free of cost to all people. That means food, shelter, and healthcare.

I have already addressed how these could be provided in an anarcho-cap or collectivist society without violence or coercion. The problem with my proposition is while providing increased liberty, flexibility and more consistent ethics it does pose potential instability in a specific community. One would expect greater inflow and outflow of residents if they changed their mind or were unhappy with their community standards in social services. There could be a risk of a sudden mass exodus if corruption sinks in the community. These are fair tradeoffs to make IMHO.

Quote from: Beliathon on August 07, 2014, 03:30:49 AM

All we need to do is convince the world to abandon fiat and adopt Bitcoin.

Well, that is one great thing about Bitcoin, It certainly has a big tent of proponents from every motivation and background.