Quote from: smooth on August 07, 2014, 10:16:05 PM

Quote from: carloss on August 07, 2014, 10:08:51 PM

Quote from: cubex on August 07, 2014, 08:43:30 PM

Yes, we need the optimisation desperately. On average I am getting 1.2-1.3mh over a longer period of time (from initial 1.4mh) versus 3mh+ Wolf is getting (he has improved over 2.2mh and I am not sure if he is sharing his private miner to a few privileged). That is less than half of the hash rate of what Wolf's private miner can do. This is by no mean a small amount! With the current exchange rate of 0.000024, we are all losing a lot when mining with the public miner.

Why is this thread full of crying people? This is really pathetic! Yes, it is a significant difference in performance, but it is not devastating. You just mine 50% of what he does with the same HW, this is still fine. Instead of crying and waiting for everything served on a silver plate, you can:

1) dedicate your own time to learn CUDA programming, run NvProfiler and do your own optimizations, like Wolf0 did
2) pay someone to do optimizations for you
3) buy twice more HW you have now

+1

4) Organize fundraising to crowdfund releasing a faster miner. This is really a good fit since there is an objective way to measure it. "2x the speed on such and such hardware, you get X amount of coins."

Stop expecting people to do free work and hand you free money by helping you mine. It is pathetic and stupid.

I agree BTW that 50% is not atrocious. It is probably still quite profitable over the cost of electricity or compared to most other coins you could mine.

yes it's profitable at current price (it would even more without the 5% rejects on 1gh pool) and remember that a more optimized cuda miner also means higher temperature, more noise and more electricity...
here with 35 degree i would have stop mining if i didn't found out about xcn and the public gpu miner because the actual ccminer is so optimized that even "cool" algos are pushing gpu temperature at 80 degree...