You mean like how you accused me of being biased, even though my rating scheme is laid out in full, is numerical and is automatic according to the automatic criteria?
And no, I am not a member of Wasp, I didn't join that for a reason. You left me positive trust for being 'such an asset to the community' to get me to join, then removed it when my views didn't align exactly with yours (or the other 50,000 chefs who all think their opinions can equally be integrated into ONE rating).
I suggested you go deal with WASP that seeing as you
are the only person working on it and everyone wants to sell their shares. And yes, I am still on that mailing list, and yes, I have asked several times to be removed from it.
Interesting.
Attack the man.
Goes without saying you seem to ignore the point of others offering you advice.
How about you work on your thread and how transparent it is and I will work on mine and as for working on the Wasp there are 54 other people you included that are members of that group. Feel free to step up and do more if you like. As for Xian01... he should go worry about BCP19 and the BFL thread seems he can't leave that mole alone.
Interesting that no one commented on the ratings. Laughable.
Maybe you should concentrate on wasp rather than proving than no one will ever be happy with any answer anyone comes up with, even one as basic as good or bad.
Amen.
The Wasp project has become a big joke to me as a result of Bicks' social-justice-warrior efforts here.
*mumbles something about glass-houses*