Quote from: snailbrain on August 11, 2014, 03:09:00 PM

Quote from: bigminner on August 10, 2014, 02:31:39 AM

Quote from: redbeans2012 on August 10, 2014, 01:21:27 AM

Quote from: BGB_HUC on August 10, 2014, 12:56:38 AM

Quote from: redbeans2012 on August 10, 2014, 12:28:36 AM

So noone thinks limiting how many coins a player can hold is a good idea? I'm not a gamer, but when I used to be there was always a limit before I had to deposit in the "bank".

oh well just throwing out my thoughts. Tongue

This wouldn't be at the top of my list, but I see your points . To continue the discussion, what kind of limit are you thinking? 50, 100, 500, 1000?

I was thinking around 100. Make the big guys in the middle come back to the wallet more often. Give others a chance to steal their coins more often. I think it could balance things a bit more.

I realize its not top priority, but maybe something to talk about more once other bugs etc are sorted out.

You are right. Although the modification is very easy, but the dev team can not see it's importance. The bot lib is important, but it is not necessary and urgent. The pruning is also not urgent. But the problem of double spending of wallet is very very urgent to be processed. They work hard here and there, but not hit the key problem.

This issue is being worked on??

try to follow github for issues and updates

"The pruning is also not urgent". What?!?! Of course it's important. You are having trouble as a large bot army user i assume, so you aren't making "enough" profit. However, no NEW people, who might drive the price of the coin up, are going to get into the game if it takes weeks to sync up. The pruning is surely of equal importance, and I know they are working on it.

I am talking to bigminner, not snailbrain =)